Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47374 (AP)

Sodadasi Praveen Chakravarthy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9993/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010180612021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9993/2021 Between: 1. SODADASI PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTHY,, S/O. SURESH KIRAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 0CC . EMPLYEE, R/O D.NO.5- 61/55, ANJANI STREET, MOTHER THERISA CHILDREN HOME, NEAR APSP CAMP, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPALSECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DEPURTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CUM INVESTIGATING OFFICER, CID, REGIONAL OFFICE A.P CID OFFICE., MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTIRCT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GVNRSSS VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. Y L SIVAKALPANA REDDY(SC CUM SPL PP,CID) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing the Notice U/S 91,102 Cr.P.C dated 30.04- 2021 against the petitioner /Accused is illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violation of Articles 20(3) , 21 of the Constitution of India besides against the well settled Legal principle reported in 2005 (1), SCC, 568. Consequently set aside the same.” 2 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by a coordinate bench of this Court dated 14.06.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2021, no further orders are required in this matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9993 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr