Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47373 (KAR)

JAMIA MASJID KURHATTI PETH v. MAHAMAMAD FAFEEK HUSSAINSAB SHIRHTTI

CRP/100021/2016 · 2025-03-24

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5344 CRP No. 100021 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 100021 OF 2016 (-) BETWEEN: 1. JAMIA MASJID KURHATTI PETH, BETAGERI-GADAG, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR. ABDULGANI HUSSAINSAB MULGUND, AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O: KURHATTI PETH, BETAGERI, TAL & DIST: GADAG-582101. 2. ANWAR S/O. MULLASAB ITI, SECRETARY OF JAMIA MASJID KURHATTI PETH, BETAGERI-GADAG, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KURHATTI PETH, BETAGERI, TAL & DIST: GADAG-582101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MAHAMAMAD FAFEEK HUSSAINSAB SHIRHATTI, PRESIDENT OF PALAH-E-ISLAM COMMITTEE, BETAGER-GADAG, DIST: GADAG, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KURAHATTI PETH, BETAGERI, TAL & DIST: GADAG-582101. 2. ABDUL RAZAKSAB IBRAHIMSAB WADDANKATTI, SECRETARY FALAH-E-ISALM COMMITTEE, AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KURAHATTI PETH, BETAGERI, TAL & DIST: GADAG-582101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.G. RAHUT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2; R1-ABATED) Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5344 CRP No. 100021 of 2016 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC R/W. SECTION 83(9) OF WAKF ACT 1995 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.01.2016 PASSED IN KWT/GDG/SR/O.S.5/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI BY ALLOWING THE REVISION PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Notice issued by this court to petitioner No.1 is returned as unserved as the petitioner No.1 is no more and notice on petitioner No.2 is served personally as per letter dated 31.01.2025 addressed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Gadag. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner No.2 or his counsel. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB: CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6