Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 47373 (BOM)
MR. ROSHAN S/O VASANT BAWANKULE v. MISS. SHUBHANGI EX-WIFE OF ROSHAN BAWANKULE
CAO/366/2024 · 2025-03-28
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47373 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47373 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 93-CAO366-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 366 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 4944 OF 2024 (ROSHAN VASANT BAWANKULE...VS..MISS SHUBHANGI EX-WIFE OF ROSHAN BAWANKULE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S.Paliwal, Advocate for Applicant. Shri Tabish T. Mirza, Adv. h/f. Shri A.M.Quazi, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND
PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 21, 2025.
1. Shri Mirza, learned counsel for the respondent-sole, states that the respondent has received the amount towards costs, imposed as a condition for condonation of delay.
2. In that view of the matter, the office objection is dispensed with.
3. The office is directed to place this matter for admission on 16/06/2025.
(PRAVIN S.PATIL,J) (ANIL S.KILOR,J) RRaut..