SHRI AMEET S/O AVINASH MANE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/101902/2025 · 2025-07-07
Venkatesh Naik T
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47371 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47371 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8435 CRL.P No. 101902 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101902 OF 2025 (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI AMEET S/O. AVINASH MANE, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCCUPATION: MECHANIC, R/O. RENUKA MANDIR, SIDDARTH COLONY, NIPPANI, DISTRICT-BELAGAVI, PIN-591237.
2.
SHRI SHANTANU S/O/ ASHOK CHOUGALE.
AGE: 21 YEARS. OCCUPATION: PRIVATE WORK.
R/O/ BUDDHA NAGAR, NIPPANI, DISTRICT-BELAGAVI, PIN-591237. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. M. MUCHHANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE POLICE INSPECTOR, NIPPANI TOWN POLICE STATION, DISTRICT BELAGAVI, PIN-591237, REPRESENTED BY ITS STAE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT: DHARWAD BENCH, PIN-580011. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.483 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO ALLOWED THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.12 & 13 AND ENLARGED ON REGULAR BAIL BY IMPOSING REASONABLE CONDITIONS IN NIPPANI TOWN P.S CRIME NO.61/2024 U/S.189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2)(A), 103, 238 R/W. 190, 49 AND 3(5) OF BNS PENDING TRIAL ON THE FILE OF VII ADDL DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE BELAGAVI SITTING AT CHIKKODI IN S.C. NO.5002/2025, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad
Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8435 CRL.P No. 101902 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent-State are present.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo. Memo reads as under:
“It is humbly submitted that these petitioners request this Hon’ble Court to give them permission to withdraw the case with liberty to file fresh petition to meet the ends of justice and equity.”
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo, petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted as sought for.
Note: It is made clear that the petitioners may seek similar relief soon after examination of material witnesses.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE HMB /CT-/AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24