1 APHC010496152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25508/2025 Between: 1. R SRINIVASULU, , S/O. R. VISWANADHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-250-B-8-12-10, MADIRARAJA NAGAR, B.K. PALLI VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, (NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE MADANAPALLE MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MADANAPALLE. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, MADANAPALLE MUNICIPALITY, MADANAPALLE TOWN. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioners representation Dt. 21-06-2022 as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of the Fundamental Right guaranteed under the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to consider the petitioners representation Dt. 21-06-2022 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondent No.2 to consider the petitioners representation Dt. 21-06-2022 pending the writ petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YANAGUNURU SHASHANK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25508 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondent No.2 in not considering the representation dated 21.06.2022, whereby the 2nd respondent was involved in illegal business conducted by the 3rd party, which is resulting in air pollution. 2. It is submitted that the said third party is using chemicals and other material resulting in pollution. 3. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 21.06.2022, as seen from the enclosures, and has kept quite all these months. It is submitted that on receipt of a fresh representation, the respondent authorities would be able to consider it in accordance with law. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioner to submit a fresh representation. On such submission, the respondent authorities to consider it in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:23.09.2025 NKA 4 665 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25508 of 2025 Date: 23.09.2025 NKA