IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9640 of 2022 ====================================================== 1. Shyam Kumar S/o Narayan Das Sharma, R/o Vill. - Chanda, P.O.- Mainpur Chanda, P.S.- Mahendia District- Arwal (Bihar). 2. Amrita Kumari, D/o Jagat Kishore Singh, R/o Vill. - Aripur, P.O.- Dharaut, P.S. - Makhdumpur, Dist. - Jehanabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary (Principal Secretary) Education Department (HRD Department) Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director (Primary Education), Education Dept. Govt. of Bihar Patna. 3. The District Magistrate Arwal. 4. The District Magistrate Jehanabad. 5. The DDC Arwal. 6. The DDC Jehanabad. 7. The District Education Officer, Arwal. 8. The DEO Jehanabad. 9. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Arwal. 10. The DPO (Esta) Jehanabad. 11. The Block Development Officer, Kaler (Arwal). 12. The Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur. Jehanabad 13. The Block Education Officer, Kaler, Arwal 14. The Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur, Jehababad 15. The Prakhand Panchayat Raj Padadhikari Cum-Member Secretary, Block Teacher, Niyojan Unit, Kaler, Arwal. 16. The Prakhand Panchayat Raj Padadhikari-cum-Member Secretary, Block Teacher Niyojan Unit, Makhdumpur. Jehababad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Koushlendra Narayan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy 1, S.C.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 8 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. By filing the present writ application, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs: Patna High Court CWJC No.9640 of 2022(8) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 i) For issuance of Mandamus against the respondents concerned for doing counselling as well as selection/appointment of the petitioners as physical Teacher/Instructor in the concerned Units. ii) For issuance of mandamus against the respondents concerned to appoint the petitioners as Teacher/Physical Teacher/Instructor in the concerned Units. iii) For necessary orders to the authorities concerned to keep seats vacant against the selection and appointment of the teachers in the selection/appointment Units concerned. (iv) For any other relief (s) for which the petitioners would be found entitled in the given facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ application, the grievance of petitioner no.1 has been redressed, but regarding petitioner no.2, he has no instruction/knowledge. 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum in case the grievance of petitioner no.2 has not been redressed as yet. 5. Permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. divyanshi/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U