Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47347 (KAR)

SHRIDHAR S/O VAKOBA PATIL v. PRIYANKA W/O SHRIDHAR PATIL

WP/106905/2023 · 2025-03-25

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5448 WP No. 106905 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106905 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SHRIDHAR S/O VAKOBA PATIL, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: SAIKRUPA BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, OPP. SWAMI NARAYAN TEMPLE, NARE, AMBEGAON, KHURD, DHOLGARWADI, TQ: CHANDGAD, DIST: KOLHAPUR-416 507. 2. ANJANA W/O. VAKOBA PATIL, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: SAIKRUPA BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, OPP. SWAMI NARAYAN TEMPLE, NARE, AMBEGAON, KHURD, DHOLGARWADI, TQ: CHANDGAD, DIST: KOLHAPUR-416 507. 3. SMITA W/O. SANJEEV PATIL, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.NO.253/5, NEAR SANTACRUZE CHAPEL, VADDEN, SUCCORRO, PROVOREM, GOA-403 501. 4. SANJEEV S/O. RAMA PATIL, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: H.NO.253/5, NEAR SANTACRUZE CHAPEL, VADDEN, SUCCORRO, PROVOREM, GOA-403 501. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHRIPRASAD.J.JOSHI., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5448 WP No. 106905 of 2023 AND: PRIYANKA W/O SHRIDHAR PATIL, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: PLOT NO.363, BUDA SCHEME, NO.51, LAKSHMI TEK, BELAGAVI-590 009. … RESPONDENT (SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 READ WITH SECTION 482 CR.P.C., OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Shriprasad J.Joshi., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition in terms of the memo and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5448 WP No. 106905 of 2023 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 52