Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47345 (CHH)

SIKENDER SINGH DHILLON v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3334/2025 · 2025-11-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:54104 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3334 of 2025 Sikender Singh Dhillon S/o Shri Jogendra Singh Aged About 74 Years R/o House No. 14, Pyara Singh Colony, Rupnagar, Ropar Rupnagar, Punjab. ... Petitioner(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O,cer, Police Station - Surajapur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 06.11.2025 1. This is an o,ce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 06.11.2023, passed in MCRC No. 6537 of 2023, while allowing the bail of the petitioner, namely, Sikender Singh Dhillon, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certi8ed copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on one occasion also, this Court had granted extension of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 time for compliance of the order dated 06.11.2023. 4. The learned Special Judge (Protection of Depositors Interest Act), Surajpur, District – Surajpur (C.G.) vide her request letter dated 10.10.2025 has requested for grant of six months time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that a supplementary charge- sheet has been 8led against the two remaining absconding accused in the case. The trial has been re-initiated against the two accused named in the supplementary charge-sheet and the statements of all witnesses are required to be recorded afresh, which will take time. Therefore, he requests that this Court may kindly grant six months' time for concluding the trial. 6. The request made by the learned trial Court, is allowed, however, instead of granting six months, this Court deems it appropriate to grant further 04 months time for concluding the trial from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed o6 with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certi8ed copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal