Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47344 (RAJ)

PRAKASH SAINI S/O SURAJ MAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12755/2025 · 2025-11-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43780] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12755/2025 Prakash Saini S/o Suraj Mal Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Dhani Telyawali, Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail At Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.258/2025 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District-Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 8, 15 and 18 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that the contraband recovered from the present petitioner is 26.50 kg of poppy straw, which is below the commercial quantity. He submits that though a case of a different nature is pending against the present petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 08.09.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would [2025:RJ-JP:43780] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12755/2025] be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Prakash Saini S/o Suraj Mal Saini shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/84