Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47342 (ALL)

AVANINDRA KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/14274/2025 · 2025-04-27

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:65777 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14274 of 2025 Applicant :- Avanindra Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 23.09.2024 by which the non-bailable warrants has been issued in Case No. 1204 of 2015, arising out of Case Crime No.469 of 2014, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/F.T.C., Auraiya. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was on bail at the time of issuing non bailable warrant. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the position of law. It is settled position of law that N.B.W. should be issued as a last resort after the litigant fails to respond the notices/summons and bailable warrant. It is further submitted that non-bailable warrant has been issued without issuing any summon and bailable warrant. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 528 of B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Sanjeet Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad