Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47340 (KAR)

SRI.SUNIL S/O BHARAMANI CHAVAN v. SMT.SAVITA W/O PARASHURAM SHESHAGIRI

CRP/100118/2024 · 2025-03-14

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4761 CRP No. 100118 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 100118 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SUNIL S/O. BHARAMANI CHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 2. SRI. RANJEET S/O. NAGESH CHAVAN , AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 3. SRI. ABHIJEET S/O. NAGESH CHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT NO.2223, BHOI GALLI, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT, BELAGAVI-590001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. RAGHAVENDRA RAO & SMT. V. VIDYA, ADVOCATES) AND: SMT. SAVITA W/O. PARASHURAM SHESHAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & BUSINESS, R/AT ARYA-TEJ BUILDING, PLOT NO.731, BUDA-KANBARGI LAYOUT, RAMATIRTHNAGAR, BELAGAVI TQ. BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. R.M. HIREMATH & SRI. S.K. NADAMANI, ADVOCATES) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BELAGAVI IN O.S.NO.8/2017 DATED 17.11.2018 ON I.A.NO.3 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.03.18 10:57:27 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4761 CRP No. 100118 of 2024 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER This petition is filed by defendant No.3 to 5 assailing the order dated 17.11.2018 on I.A.No.3 (Annexure-E). Having taken note of the finding recorded by the Trial Court and as it is contended that the Trial Court has commenced recording of evidence of the parties, the petitioner does not press the petition. In view of the same, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15