LPA-1261-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 LPA-1261-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision :27.08.2025 Sat Narain Dhanwantri though his Legal representatives ..Appellants Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd, Rohtak and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate & Mr. Shubham Shariya, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) CM-3095-LPA-2025 1. Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 731 days in filing the present appeal. 2. Notice of the application to the respondents. 3. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate & Mr. Shubham Shariya, Advocate appearing for Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate accepts notice on behlaf of respondents No.1 & 2 and raises no objection for the grant of prayer as made in the present application. 4. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 731 AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.28 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1261-2025 (O&M) -2- days in filing the present appeal is condoned. LPA-1261-2025 5. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants submits that as per the averments, certain dues which have been made towards the appellants to be payable are not justifiable hence, present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further but, a liberty be given to the appellants to first approach the respondents by way of filing an appropriate representation for the clarification of the said dues which are being imposed and in case, after the deciding of representation any grievance of the appellants still subsists, the appellants can avail an appropriate remedy for the redressal of their grievance. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 submits that in case, any representation is received at the hands of the appellants, the same will be decided in accordance with law by passing an appropriate speaking order within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 7. As prayed for, present appeal is disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty as prayed for. 8. Ordered accordingly. 9. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 27, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.28 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document