Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:52143
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5352 of 2025 1 - Rajkumari Devi W/o Late Shri Vijay Ram Aged About 55 Years Cast Chamar, Nagar Ramanujganj, Tahsil Ramanujganj, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal
Nagar,
New
Raipur,
Distt.
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Ramanujganj, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board 27/10/2025
1. With the consent of the parties, heard finally.
2
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs:
“10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authorities particularly respondent no. 2 and 4 to decide the pending applications for correction of land in the online map revenue record within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order on the part of the respondent authorities, but the petitioner is seeking direction to the concerned respondent authorities to expeditiously decide the pending application for his land in the online map revenue record.
4. Learned State counsel raised no objection in this regard.
5. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of the counsels for the respective parties, respondent no 2 and 4 are directed to decide the pending applications (Annexure P/1) for correction of the land in the online map revenue record, subject to the verification of the documents,
3 expeditiously as soon as possible, in accordance with law, rules and regulations.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Arvind Kumar Verma)
JUDGE Madhurima