Aditya Educational Society, v. Medical Council of India,
WP/22921/2014 · 2025-09-23
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47335 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47335 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010635182014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22921/2014
Between:
1. ADITYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, 6-2-13, CHINNA BAZAAR, SRIKAKULAM, AP.NO.532 001, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DR. M.M.VILEKAR. 2. GREAT EASTERN MEDICAL SCHOOL,, RAGOLU, SRIKAKULAM, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. M.M.VILEKAR. 3. DR. M.M.VILEKAR,, S/O MARUTI RAO VILEKAR, R/O 6-2-13, CHINNA BAZAR, SRIKAKULAM, AP 532 001. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BOCKET-14, SECTOR-A, DARAKA PAHASE-1, NEW DELHI-110
077. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINSTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL.SECY., MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 4. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA,
5. CONVENOR EAMCET 201415, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any Writ, Order or Direction, more
2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting the renewal of approval to the second petitioner institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 201415 by issuing communication in File No. U-12012/340/2014- ME(PII) dated 15-07-2014 as arbitrary, illegal, unlawful nd contrary to the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the regulations made there under, apart from being unconstitutional and set aside the same and direct the respondents to grant approval and treat the 2nd petitioner institution as an approved institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 201415 and permit the 2nd petitioner institution to make admission for the academic year 2014-15 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 28735 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to supend the proceedings in File No.U-12012/340/2014- ME(PII) dt.15-07-2014 and thereby direct respondents No.1 and 2 to reconsider and grant renewal of approval for the fifty batch of 2nd petitioner institution for the academic year 2014-15, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 28736 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the resondents to treat the 2nd petitioner institution as a validly approved institution and include the name of the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions for making admissions to the academic year 2014-15 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
OMAR A PASHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
24th September, 2025 cbn
4 266 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.22921 of 2014
24th September, 2025 cbn