Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47334 (AP)

Tanikonda Gopi Nadha Kumar, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2650/2020 · 2025-12-01

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010037492020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2650/2020 Between: 1. TANIKONDA GOPI NADHA KUMAR,, S/ O. T. GANGAMUNI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1/66, PULLAMNAIDU KANDRIGA VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, , RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. N R KAMMAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, N.R.KAMMAPALLI VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 2 7. PULLARNNAIDU KANDRIGA GRAM PANCHAYAT, PULLAM.NAIDU KANDRIGA VILLAGE, RAXNACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 8. NETHAKUPPAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, , NETHAKUPPAM VILLAGE, FAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, C HITTOOR DISTRICT-517561, RCP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the G.O.Ms. No. 210, Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (EandR) Department, Dt. 31-12-2019 as it is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and against the Provisions of the AP Panchayat Rat,Act, 1994, and Rules thereon and also Article 243 of the Constitution of India and G.O.Ms.No. 542 Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (EandR) Department, Dt. 03-12-2007, by setting aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the G.O.Ms. No. 210, Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (E&R) Department, Dt. 31-12-2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the proposed respondents to as party and necessary respondents 9 to 41 in the above WP No.2650 of 2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a letter dated 01.12.2025 has been addressed to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02nd December, 2025 RKS