APHC010634932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32899 OF 2025 Between: 1. Kalavakolu Anand Naidu,, S/o K.Srinivasulu Naidu, Aged about 50 years, R/o D.No.1-1159, Velampalem, Srikalahasti Town, Tirupati District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secr Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, , Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srikalahasti Divi District. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, Srikalahasti District. 6. The SubInspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, Srikalahasti District. 7. K Nagendra Kumar, S/o K.Chengaiah Naid D.No.1-1813, Jayaramarao Street, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, Tirupati District. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 32899 OF 2025 1. Kalavakolu Anand Naidu,, S/o K.Srinivasulu Naidu, Aged about 50 years, 1159, Velampalem, Srikalahasti Town, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, , Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srikalahasti Division, Tirupati 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, 6. The SubInspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, 7. K Nagendra Kumar, S/o K.Chengaiah Naidu, Aged about 63 years, R/o 1813, Jayaramarao Street, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, Tirupati IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Kalavakolu Anand Naidu,, S/o K.Srinivasulu Naidu, Aged about 50 years, 1159, Velampalem, Srikalahasti Town, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner etary, Home sion, Tirupati 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, 6. The SubInspector of Police, , Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, u, Aged about 63 years, R/o 1813, Jayaramarao Street, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, Tirupati 2 8. N Nissar Ahmed, S/o Meerjan Saheb, Aged about 45 years, R/o Janda veedhi, Kumar Swamy Thippa, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring (i) inaction of the Respondent No.2 to 6 in registering Crime and carrying out investigation thereto on Petitioners representations dated 08.10.2025 and 08.03.2023 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, capricious and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhija, 2023 and (ii) consequently to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to register Crime and carry out investigation in the same expeditiously (iii) and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 6 to forthwith take steps in Petitioner’s representations dated 08.10.2025 and 08.03.2023, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32899 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring (i) inaction of the Respondent No.2 to 6 in registering Crime and carrying out investigation thereto on Petitioners representations dated 08.10.2025 and 08.03.2023 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, capricious and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhija, 2023 and (ii) consequently to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to register Crime and carry out investigation in the same expeditiously (iii) and pass such….” 2. Heard Sri Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Respondent No.7 filed O.S. No.51 of 2022 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, for recovery of money and obtained an ex-parte decree on 13.08.2004. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred C.M.A. No.686 of 2005 before this Court, which was allowed, setting aside the ex parte decree. It is further submitted that Respondent No.7, who is an advocate, filed a vakalat by forging the signature of the petitioner and got the case closed by playing fraud on the Court, for which the petitioner submitted a representation to the police seeking 4 registration of a case. Learned counsel therefore prays that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the trial Court where the alleged fraud took place. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that though the petitioner filed a representation dated 08.10.2025 before Respondent No.3, after due enquiry it was found that the dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.7 is purely civil in nature and is already pending before the Sub-Court, Srikalahasti. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not filed any written complaint against Respondent No.7 before the Srikalahasti I Town Police Station in respect of the alleged issue, and that the police are not interfering in civil disputes. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the trial Court where the alleged fraud had taken place. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 26.11.2025 KKV 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 27 WRIT PETITION NO: 32899 OF 2025 Dated 26.11.2025 KKV 6 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.32899 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 26.11.2025 Dr.VJP,J This Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV