RAMLAKHAN @ KILLI SON OF SHRI BHIKAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14473/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47156] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14473/2025
1. Ramlakhan @ Killi Son Of Shri Bhikam Singh, Resident Of Thakur Pada, Bari, At Present Transport Nagar, Mahindra Agency Ke Bagal Se Bari, Thana Bari District Dholpur (The Accused Confined In District Jail Dholpur)
2. Bhola @ Ajay Son Of Pramsingh, Resident Of Thakur Pada Bari, District Dholpur. (The Accused Confined Is District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/11/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.302/2025 registered at Police Station Bari, District-Dholpur for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 352 of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Though there are 13 cases pending against the petitioner-Ramlakhan @ Killi and 11 cases are pending against the petitioner-Bhola @ Ajay as a previous antecedents but in all cases both the petitioners are bailed out. He submits that the injured-Pankaj has not sustained
[2025:RJ-JP:47156] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14473/2025] any injury on the vital part of his body except the fractures on hands and legs. No specific act has been attributed to any of the petitioners. Co-accused-Vijay against whom 14 cases were pending has been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 11.11.2025. Petitioners are behind the bars since
18.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners- Ramlakhan @ Killi Son Of Shri Bhikam Singh and Bhola @ Ajay Son Of Pramsingh be released on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Bari District Dholpur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. [2025:RJ-JP:47156] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14473/2025] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future.
(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/140