APHC010238112007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. B.DEVADANAM, S/O.RAJA RATNAM RESIDING AT ILAPARRU VILLAGE,NANDIVADA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 1. GENERAL MANAGER THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE, CENTRAL BANK LTD., MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. PRESIDENT CHENNURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, SOCIETY LTD., CHENNURU,PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayi circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue posting order to enable the petitioner to join duty pursuant to the order dated 15.3.2007 passed by the Deputy commissioner of Labour, Eluru for reinstatement into service by declaring that the inaction of the respondents in not issuing posting order to the petitionr is highly arbitr Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13915/2007 B.DEVADANAM, S/O.RAJA RATNAM RESIDING AT ILAPARRU VILLAGE,NANDIVADA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND GENERAL MANAGER THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE, CENTRAL BANK LTD., MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT PRESIDENT CHENNURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, SOCIETY LTD., CHENNURU,PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayi circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue posting order to petitioner to join duty pursuant to the order dated 15.3.2007 passed by the Deputy commissioner of Labour, Eluru for reinstatement into service by declaring that the inaction of the respondents in not issuing posting order to the petitionr is highly arbitrary, discriminatory illegal, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI B.DEVADANAM, S/O.RAJA RATNAM RESIDING AT ILAPARRU ...PETITIONER GENERAL MANAGER THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE, CENTRAL BANK LTD., MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER MACHILIPATNAM, PRESIDENT CHENNURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, SOCIETY LTD., CHENNURU,PEDANA MANDAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue posting order to petitioner to join duty pursuant to the order dated 15.3.2007 passed by the Deputy commissioner of Labour, Eluru for reinstatement into service by declaring that the inaction of the respondents in not issuing posting ary, discriminatory illegal, and violative of IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 17459 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to report for duty as secretary in the Chennuru Primary Agricultural co-operative society ltd., forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. V KISHORE 3. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER This Court, having noticed that learned counsel for the petitioner has been elevated as Judge of Telangana High Court, directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. The endorsement made by the Registry shows that the notice sent to the sole petitioner was returned unserved with endorsement ‘deceased’. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR