Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47322 (AP)

Symala Devi Kothari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/28036/2025 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010470842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28036/2025 Between: 1. SYMALA DEVI KOTHARI, W/O. TARUN KUMAR KOTHARI, AGE 40 YRS, R/O D. NO. 7-1-1, 1ST FLOOR K.T. ROAD, NEAR S.B.I, KOTHAPET VIJAYAWADA-520 001, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, 3. CHAMPALAL KOTHARI, S/O. DANMMAL JI KOTHARI AGE 70 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 12-11-11 R.R. APPA RAO STREET ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA 4. MOHANLAL KOTHARI, S/O. DANMMAL JI KOTHARI AGE 67 YRS, R/O. DOOR. NO. 11-54-39, GULABCHAND STREET, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA-001, 5. MAHENDRA KUMAR KOTHARI, S/O. CHEMPALAL KOTHARI, AGE 39 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 12-11-11 R.R. APPA RAO STREET, NEAR RAJAKUMARI CENIMAHAL ROAD, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA-001, 6. MANOJ KUMAR KOTHARI, S/O. MOHAN LAI KOTHARI AGE 46 YRS, R/O DOOR. NO. 11-54-39 GULABCHAND STREET, ONE 2 TOWN, VIJAYAWADA-001, 7. JITHENDRA KUMAR KOTHARI, S/O. CHEMPALAL KOTHARI, AGE 37 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 12-11 -11 R.R. APPA RAO STREET, NEAR R.C.M., SCHOOL, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA-001, 8. VIKAS KUMAR KOTHARI, S/O. LATE SOHANRAJ KOTHARI AGE 47 YEARS, R/O C/O. KIRAN RAJ HASTIMAIJI LUNKED, HOUSE NO.41, 3RD FLOOR, KANCHAN APARTMENTS, MAHAVEER BUILDINGS, AKKIPET MAIN ROAD, BANGLORE - 560 053 9. RAVI KUMAR KOTHARI, S/O. MOHAN LAI KOTHARI, AGE 39 YRS, R/O. DOOR. NO. 11-54-39, GULABCHAND STREET, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA-001 10. NIRMALA DEVI KOTHARI, W/O. VIKAS KUMAR KOTHARI, AGE 45 YEARS, R/O C/O. KIRAN RAJ HASTIMAIJI LUNKED. HOUSE NO.41, 3RD FLOOR, KANCHAN APARTMENTS, MAHAVEER BUILDINGS, AKKIPET MAIN ROAD, BANGLORE - 560 053 11. BHAVANA MUTHA, W/O. BABLU D. MUTHA, AGE 45 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 11-45-20, 2ND FLOOR, TAVVAVARI STREET, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking any action against the 3th, 4th, 5th,6th, 7th 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th respondents pursuant to the complaint dated. 12.08.2025 given by the Petitioner, in-spite of her repeated visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 3th, 4th, 5th,6th, 7th 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th respondents to forthwith act upon the complaint dated. 12.08.2025 and take action in accordance with law IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 herein to forthwith register a criminal case against the respondents no. the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th , 9th,10th and 3 11th pursuant to the complaint dated 12.08.2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDIPARTHI V RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28036/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking any action against the 3th, 4th, 5th,6th, 7th 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th respondents pursuant to the complaint dated. 12.08.2025 given by the Petitioner, in-spite of her repeated visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 3th, 4th, 5th,6th, 7th 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th respondents to forthwith act upon the complaint dated. 12.08.2025 and take action in accordance with law…= 2. Sri K.V.Ratnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse her remedy according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025 JLV 5 221 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28036 of 2025 Dated: 16.10.2025 JLV