HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 12 of 2025 Vijay Gangwar ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent Present:- Mr. Punit Kumar, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.220 of 2020, under Sections 302, 201, 120-B IPC, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.52 of 2021, was rejected on 06.07.2021. The second bail application, being BA2 No.160 of 2024, was dismissed in non- prosecution on 18.02.2025. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co- accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail. 5. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 2 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.04.2025 Ravi Bisht