SREEKALA v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
RP/395/2025 · 2025-04-01
Gopinath P
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4732 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4732 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:27840 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 395 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.12.2022 IN WP(C) NO.36555 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: SREEKALA, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. VIJAYAN P U PERINGAD PETTATH HOUSE, POOVATHOOR P.O., THRISSUR, PIN – 680508.
BY ADV E.V.MOLY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, 1ST FLOOR, PNB HOUSE NO.40/1461, MARKET ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682011.
BY SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP NO. 395 OF 2025 IN WP(C) NO.36555 OF 2022 2 2025:KER:27840 ORDER After arguing for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Review Petition. In the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK