Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4732 (CHH)

ABHISHEK SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/460/2024 · 2025-06-23

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:27812 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 460 of 2024 Abhishek Singh Son Of Late Shri Ramesh Singh Aged About 40 Years Working As Agricultural Representative, And Posted At Balrampur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattistgarh. Resident Of S-2, D/1, Vasundhara Vihar, Godhanpur, Ambikapur, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Avar Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Special Duty Officer, Chief Secretary Office, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. …..Respondents. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Roshan Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. RS Marhas, Addl. AG. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 24.06.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 15.12.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1, whereby removed the petitioner from the post of agricultural representative without any sufficient reason and without issuing any notice to him. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contended that pursuant to impugned order, respondents-authorities are not going to remove the petitioner from the post of agricultural representative. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to revive the same if any cause of action arise in future. 4. In view of above submissions, writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-