Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47316 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA S/O PREMSUKH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/2524/2025 · 2025-12-15

Uma Shanker Vyas

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2524/2025 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3229/2025 1. Ravindra S/o Premsukh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gundpur Police Thana Udhyog Nagar, Alwar At Present Behind Adani Factory Sankhla Police Station Bagad Tiraya, Alwar (Raj.) 2. Manesh S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gundpur Police Thana Udhyog Nagar, Alwar At Present Behind Adani Factory Sankhla Police Station Bagad Tiraya, Alwar (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jiteshu Chugh, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gautam, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 15/12/2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accused-applicants guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal appeal. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicants were on bail during trial and his sentence has already been suspended by the (2 of 2) [SOSA2524/2025 in CRLAS- 3229/2025] learned trial Court for a period of one month. He further submits that accused-applicants are willing to deposit the entire fine amount and as final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicants may be suspended. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicants. Accordingly, subject to deposition of fine imposed by the learned trial Court on the accused-applicants, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicants namely, (1) Ravindra S/o Premsukh and (2) Manesh S/o Ramjilal in Sessions Case No.07/2024 shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this court on 15.01.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /52