Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47313 (RAJ)

RAJPAL BASWAL S/O BHAGWAN SAHAI v. STATE OF RAJ.

CW/18325/2025 · 2025-12-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49301] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18325/2025 Rajpal Baswal S/o Bhagwan Sahai, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Badnagar, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli-Behror-303106, Presently Working As Principal At Government Senior Secondary School, Shyampura, Viratnagar, District Kotputli-Behror. Emloyee Id No.rjjp200618004854 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Raj., Through Principal Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan And Ex-Officio Additional Statet Project Director (Senior), Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (Smsa), Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer, District Kotputli-Behror. 4. Mukesh Kumar Jat, Principal Is Posted At Govt. Senior Secondary School, Mephliyas Asind, Bhilwara (214396), Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG, Mr. Vishal Kumar and Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully that Hon'ble the Court may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petiton, call the for entire récord relating to the case and after examining the same, impugned order dated 17.11.2025 passed by the learned Service Tribunal, the [2025:RJ-JP:49301] (2 of 2) [CW-18325/2025] impugned transfer order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 24.09.2025 passed be by the respondent No.2 may kindly quashed and set aside qua the petitioner and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to work to the post of Principal at Government Senior Secondary School, Shyampura, Viratnagar, Kotputli-Behror.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /324