SHRI.ABDUL SAMAD ABDUL MAJEED NANDGADKAR v. MILLAT CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED
CRL.RP/100087/2018 · 2025-03-20
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4730 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4730 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5101 CRL.RP No. 100087 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100087 OF 2018 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SHRI ABDUL SAMAD ABDUL MAJEED NANDGADKAR, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.4719, KAKAR GALLI, BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHREEVTSA HEGDE AND SRI SOURABH HEDGE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MILLAT CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED SHERI CHAMBERS, KHADE BAZAR, BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY ITS RECOVERY OFFICER, SHRI SHAKEEL ISMAIL TORGAL, OFFICE AT: 3910/B1, KHADAK GALLI, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENT (SOLE RESPONDENT SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE LOWER COURTS AND AFTER HEARING THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 20.03.2018, PASSED BY THE XI ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.151/2017 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 14.07.2017, PASSED BY THE JMFC-II COURT, BELAGAVI, AT BELAGAVI IN C.C.NO.174/2011 IN SO FAR AS CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC.138 OF N.I.ACT AND TO ALLOW THE PRESENT REVISION PETITION BY ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED FOR SUPRA STATED OFFENCE.
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.21 10:34:16 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5101 CRL.RP No. 100087 of 2018
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
A memo is filed seeking withdrawal of the petition.
Memo reads as under:
“The Rev. Petitioner submits that he has settled the matter with the Respondent and therefre does not want to further prosecute. Therefore the instant petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/- CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 31