Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4730 (GUJ)

GOPALBHAI RANCHHODBHAI BELADIA v. MANHARBHAI RAMAJIBHAI SOLANKI

FA/4274/2019 · 2025-01-01

Nisha M Thakore

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C/FA/4274/2019 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4274 of 2019 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4274 of 2019 ================================================================ GOPALBHAI RANCHHODBHAI BELADIA Versus MANHARBHAI RAMAJIBHAI SOLANKI ================================================================ Appearance: MR ANVESH V VYAS(5654) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,9.1,9.2 =============================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE Date : 20/02/2023 ORAL ORDER The present First Appeal as well as Civil Application for stay are filed in connection with an land bearing survey No.249, Block No.270 of village Niyol; Taluka: Palsana, District: Surat. The case is for the purpose of specific performance of the contract wherein in connection with the subject land, an agreement to sale was executed between the appellant (Original plaintiff) and the respondents (original defendants), which came to be executed on 30.04.2005. It is the case of the appellant that as the original defendants failed to comply with their part of their performance, suit was required to be filed. However, ultimately the Civil Court dismissed the suit by judgment and order dated 12.06.2019 against which the present appeal is preferred. It appears that after filing of the appeal, consistently the Courts have recorded in its order that learned advocate for the appellant has not remained present and lastly vide order dated 23.01.2023, as a chance the matter was adjourned. C/FA/4274/2019 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2023 Today also, when the matters are called out, learned advocate for the appellant-applicant is absent. Hence, the present appeal and application are hereby dismissed for default for want of prosecution. (A.Y. KOGJE, J) SIDDHARTH