$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 549/2023, I.A. 15051/2023-Stay, I.A. 16365/2023-O 39 R 2A GOOD BRANDS FOR A HEALTHY LIFE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kripa Pandit, Advocate. versus KRBL LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Shravan Bansal and Ms. Shruti Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 09.05.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant submit that the disputes inter se them in the present lis have been settled, and the terms thereof have been reduced to writing in the form of the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025, which is forming a part of record. As such, the learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant pray that a Consent Decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) may be passed in terms thereof. 2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff also submits that, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025 inter se the plaintiff and the defendant, the plaintiff does not wish to press for any other relief qua the defendant. 3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant confirm the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:30 terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025 and identify the signatures of their respective clients. 4. This Court has perused the terms of Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025 as recorded inter se the plaintiff and the defendant and finds them to be lawful. 5. In light of the above, the present suit is decreed in terms of the settlement between the plaintiff and the defendant as recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025. 6. Needless to mention, the plaintiff and the defendant shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement as recorded in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025. 7. Learned counsel for the plaintiff also prays that since the disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant have been settled amicably, the court fees paid by the plaintiff be refunded in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. 8. This Court is of the view that since the disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant have been amicably settled but the same remained pending for a considerable long period, refund of 50% of the Court fees paid by the plaintiff is justifiable. 9. Let a Certificate of refund of 50% of the Court fees paid by the plaintiff be prepared by the Registry and handed over to the learned counsel for the plaintiff. 10. Registry is directed to draw up the Decree Sheet. 11. Needless to mention, the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2025, shall form a part of the Decree Sheet. 12. Accordingly, in view of the above, the present suit, alongwith the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:30 pending applications, stands disposed of. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 9, 2025 NA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:30