Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47287 (RAJ)

MINAKSHI SHARMA D/O LATE SHRI KRISHAN LAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17856/2025 · 2025-11-26

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17856/2025 Minakshi Sharma D/o Late Shri Krishan Lal Sharma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o House No. 93, Keshav Nagar, Shivbadi, Bikaner, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan). 3. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Jodhpur Division, Jodhpur. 4. The District Education Officer (Hqrs), Secondary Education, Phalodi (Raj.). 5. The Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Khidrat, District Phalodi (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent be directed to release the pending payment/due salary, due Annual Grade Increments from 2018 to 2025, along with interest @18% per annum will all consequential benefits. ii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be [2025:RJ-JP:48055] (2 of 2) [CW-17856/2025] directed to delete the red ink entries made in the service book of petitioner and thereafter prepare a fresh service Book of petitioner; iii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25.02.2023 (Anx.3) at the earliest; 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /117