Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47285 (RAJ)

RAVI KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI JAI RAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18145/2025 · 2025-11-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47845] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18145/2025 Ravi Kumar Saini S/o Shri Jai Ram Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Dhani Sirsawali, Post Ganwari, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Joint Director, School Education, Churu, Division, Churu (Raj.) 3. District Education Officer, Head Quarter, Secondar Education, Sikar (Raj.) 4. Chief Block Education Officer, Block Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) 5. Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Government School, Dhani Guman Singh, Godawas, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) 6. Director And Ex- Officio Joint Secretary, Directorate Of Treasury And Accounts, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Issue a writ, order, or direction directing the respondents to regularize the petitioner’s pay and allowances as Senior Assistant with effect from 01.04.2024 and further directing the respondents to rectify the pay [2025:RJ-JP:47845] (2 of 2) [CW-18145/2025] anomaly/discrepancy in the petitioner’s service records forthwith ii) Any appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /120