Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47285 (AP)

PARASA VASU v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/34717/2025 · 2025-12-11

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010674422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34717/2025 Between: 1. PARASA VASU, S/O. PARASA SIMHADRI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, AGENT CODE 0335067N, LIC OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE, MACHILIPATNAM-LL, R/O. D.NO13/350, NIZAMPETA, NEAR GANGANAMMA TEMPLE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001. 2. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL OFFICE, YOGAKSHEMA BUILDING, JEEVAN BIMA MARG., P.O BOX 19953, MUMBAI 400021. 3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MACHILIPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari, the quashing impugned suspension order dated 29.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent placing the petitioner's agency under suspension as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to Regulation 16 of the LIC 2 JS,J W.P.No.34717/2025 (Agents) Regulations, 2017, and consequently set aside the same impugned suspension order dated 29.05.2025 and permit the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspending the operation of the impugned suspension order dated 29.05.2025 and permit the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 JS,J W.P.No.34717/2025 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard both the learned counsel. Both the parties agreed to dispose the writ petition at admission stage. The Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the respondents to consider the explanation submitted on 11.04.2025 by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.12.2025 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.34717/2025 135 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34717/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025 RSD