Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47277 (KAR)

SHRI BHUJABALI JINNAPPA KORIGER S/O JINNAPPA KORIGER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/102494/2024 · 2025-03-25

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5523 CRL.P No. 102494 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102494 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SHRI. BHUJABALI JINNAPPA KORIGER S/O. JINNAPPA KORIGER, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE IN KPTCL, TERDAL, R/O: TERDAL, TQ: RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT – 587 315. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. L. SANDRIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH TERDAL P.S., REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD. 2. SHRIKANT RAMU SUNAGAR, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O: TERDAL, TQ: RABAKAVI - BANHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOTE – 587 315. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1; R2 - SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE FIR IN TERDAL P.S. CRI. NO. 74/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 337, 338, 304(A) OF I.P.C., PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. BANAHATTI AT ANNEXURE-B, SO FAR AS PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 IS CONCERNED, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5523 CRL.P No. 102494 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file fresh petition. 2. Memo, read thus; “Herein memo on behalf of petitioners is as under: In view of the charge sheet filed by the I.O petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdrawn the petition and also permitted to file fresh petition on same cause of action. Hence, this memo.” 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53