SANDEEP SWAMI S/O SHRI SURESH SWAMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1239/2025 · 2025-02-12
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6255] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1239/2025 Sandeep Swami S/o Shri Suresh Swami, Aged About 20 Years, R/o House No. 510, Swami Basti Nahari Ka Naka, Shastri Nagar, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi Mr. Lakhan Singh Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 12/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.01/2025 registered at Police Station Sanjay Circle, Jaipur City North for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of BNS 2023 and Section 4/25 of Arms Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that according to the prosecution case it has been alleged against the petitioner that they were planning to commit dacoity. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since
[2025:RJ-JP:6255] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1239/2025] his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, trial will take time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Sandeep Swami S/o Shri Suresh Swami shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded.
[2025:RJ-JP:6255] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1239/2025]
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court.
10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MAHIMA/311