[2025:RJ-JP:49557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18704/2025 Smt. Meena Saxena D/o Shri Jagannath Prasad Shrivastava, W/o Late Shri Vikas Saxena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Plot No. 7-B- 40, Pawanpuri, South Extension, Bikaner. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Board Of Revenue, Ajmer Through Its Registrar. 3. District Collector, District Dholpur. 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Badi, District Dholpur. 5. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Additional Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Regional Office, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- 1. The respondents may kindly be directed to grant family pension to the petitioner in place of her father who expired on 03.10.1994 being a widow daughter of her father w.e.f. 29.08.2021 the day on which husband of the petitioner expired. [2025:RJ-JP:49557] (2 of 2) [CW-18704/2025] 2. The respondents may further be directed to grant arrears of family pension to the petitioner w.e.f. 29.08.2021 till date along with interest @9% per annum as per Rule 89 of the Pension Rules 1996. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /412