[2025:RJ-JP:49160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18468/2025 Ramchandra Son Of Shri Shyam Lal Yadav, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village-Post Dwarikpura, Tehsil Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror. (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary, Panchaytiraj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Chief Engineer (Admn.), Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur. 5. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Dwarikpura Panchayat Samiti Kotputali Behror. 6. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samity Dwarikpura, Panchayat Samiti Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror 7. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Parisad Kotputali Behror (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and accept this writ petition by an [2025:RJ-JP:49160] (2 of 3) [CW-18468/2025] appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof :- (a) Respondents may kindly be directed to make payments to the petitioner as per minimum wages decided by the govt at their initial appointments (b) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.10.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18689/2017 (Ganesh Paliwal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on on basis of decision in case of Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union Vs. The State of Rajasthan (SB CWP No. 15098/2012). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Ganesh Paliwal (supra) and Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in cases referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, [2025:RJ-JP:49160] (3 of 3) [CW-18468/2025] the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /183