Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84869 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12317 of 2025 Petitioner :- Urmila Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Himanshu Shukla holding brief of Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No. 4 are present. This Court vide order dated 30.4.2025 granted time to learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions in the matter. Shri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents submits that as per the instructions dated 17.5.2025 received from the office of the Sub Divisional Officer, Badlapur, Jaunpur, the proceedings of Case No. 2690 of 2024 (Shashibala vs. Urmila), under Section 116 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006, has been finally concluded vide order dated 14.5.2025. The relevant part of the order dated 14.5.2025 passed in the aforesaid case is reproduced as under:- "ममैनने उभयपकक्षो कने वविदद्धान अधधिविकद्धा कने तकर्को कक्षो ससुनद्धा एविवं पतद्धाविलली कद्धा अविलक्षोकन एविवं अनसुशलीलन वकयद्धा गयद्धा। पतद्धाविलली कने अविलक्षोकन एविवं अनसुशलीलन सने स्पष्ट हक्षोतद्धा हमै वक हल्कद्धा लनेखपद्धाल दद्धारद्धा प्रस्तसुत फद्धाट वदिनद्धावंक 03.04.2025 वनयमद्धानसुसद्धार प्रस्तसुत वकयद्धा गयद्धा धजिसमम दिक्षोनक्षो पकक्षों कक्षो बरद्धाबर -बरद्धाबर सड़क पर फद्धाट बनद्धायद्धा गयद्धा। ऐसली सस्स्थिवत धजिसकद्धा लनेखपद्धाल दद्धारद्धा प्रस्तसुत फद्धाट वदिनद्धावंक 03 04.2025 वनयमद्धानसुसद्धार बनद्धाकर प्रस्तसुत वकयद्धा गयद्धा धजिसने पसुवष्ट वकयने जिद्धानने मम कक्षोई वविधधिक अड़चन प्रतलीत नहली हक्षोतद्धा हमै। अततः उपरक्षोक वविविनेचनद्धा कने आधिद्धार पर उवमरलद्धा पत्नली सलीतद्धारद्धाम वनविद्धासली उदिपसुरघद्धाटमपसुर परगनद्धा रद्धारली तहसलील बदिलद्धापसुर धजिलद्धा जिजौनपसुर दद्धारद्धा प्रस्तसुत समनेकन प्रद्धास्थिरनद्धा पत वदिनद्धावंक 01.05.2025 तदिद नसुसद्धार वनस्तद्धाररत वकयद्धा जिद्धातद्धा हमै। शवशबद्धालद्धा पत्नली अशक्षोक कसु मद्धार वनविद्धासली उदिपसुरघद्धाटमपसुर परगनद्धा रद्धारली तहसलील बदिलद्धापसुर धजिलद्धा जिजौनपसुर दद्धारद्धा प्रस्तसुत विद्धादि वदिनद्धावंक 06.06.2024 असनतम रूप सने वडिककी करतने हल्कद्धा लनेखपद्धाल दद्धारद्धा दिद्धाधखल फद्धाट वदिनद्धावंक 03.04.2025 पसुवष्ट वकयद्धा जिद्धातद्धा हमै। वनयमद्धानसुसद्धार स्टद्धाम्प दिद्धाधखल हक्षो। असनतम वडिककी बनद्धायली जिद्धाय। परविद्धानद्धा जिद्धारली हक्षो। विद्धादि आविश्यक कद्धायरविद्धाहली पतद्धाविलली दिधखल दिफ्तर हक्षो।" Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has very emphatically argued that despite the full knowledge of the pendency of the present writ petition, wherein the legality of the order dated 25.3.2025 is under challenge, the respondent No. 3 ought to have waited for the outcome of the said writ petition. Taking into consideration the changed circumstances, as mentioned herein above, this Court at this stage finds that no useful purpose would be served to keep the present writ petition pending. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 14.5.2025 passed in Case No. 2690 of 2024 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent Court under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. It is provided that in case if the petitioner prefers appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent Court having jurisdiction within a period of statutory limitation along with an application for interim relief, the same shall be considered by the appellate court strictly in accordance with law and shall make an endeavor to decide the same within a period of six months, as contemplated under Section 183 (4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules 2016. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the case and has disposed of the writ petition enabling the petitioner to file statutory appeal before the competent Court. In the interest of justice it is provided that in case if the application for interim relief along with the aforesaid appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is filed within a period of 15 days from today, the said application shall be disposed of within a maximum period of one month from the date of its filing. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. As an interim protection, it is provided that the parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the nature and possession of the property for a period of two months from today or till the disposal of the application for interim relief whichever is earlier. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Sumaira Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad