[2025:RJ-JP:48074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18163/2025 Chandrahans Chaube S/o Shri Brij Ballabh Chaubey, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village And Post Baragama, Tehsil Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer (H.q.), Jaisalmer. 4. Principal, Government Girls Sr. Secondary School, Myajlar, Sam, District Jaisalmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to treat the petitioner to have been retired from service w.e.f. 31.8.2025 and accordingly grant him the pension and pensionary benefits and the arrears whereof be paid to him with interest @ 12% p.a. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:48074] (2 of 3) [CW-18163/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 10.03.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17999/2018 (Deepak Shah Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of to allow the petitioner to submit representation in light of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17999/2018 (Deepak Shah Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) (supra). 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:48074] (3 of 3) [CW-18163/2025] 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/83