Poleboina Subbaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/19284/2021 · 2025-12-02
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47258 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47258 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010321152021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19284/2021 Between:
POLEBOINA SUBBAIAH,, S/O. NARASAIAH, AGE - 60 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. PEDDAYACHAVARAM VILLAGE, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARKAPUR POLICE STATION, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 5. THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CUM TAHSILDAR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. TANNEERU MALLAMMA, W/O. CHINA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. PEDDAYACHAVARAM VILLAGE, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. THANNEERU PRASAD, S/O. CHINA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDAYACHAVARAM VILLAGE, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V.N.V.SURYA DATTU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondents particularly respondents 5 and 6 on petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2021 submitted for initiating Proceedings under Chapter VIII and also Chapter X (C) and (D) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the respondents 7 and 8 for their repeated illegal acts, thereby causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at his agricultural landed properties of Ac.3.30 cents in Sy.No. 686/2 of Peddayachavaram Revenue Village in Markapur Mandal of Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents 2 to 6 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6, particularly respondents 5 and 6 to initiate proceedings under Chapter-VIII and also Chapter X (C) and (D), Section 107 and 145 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against respondents 7, 8 and their henchmen.”
2. None represented for the Petitioner. The proceedings sheet dated 11.11.2025 also shows that there was no representation for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4.
In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:03.12.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.19284 of 2021
Dt.03.12.2025
Dinesh