Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47250 (RAJ)

BABI KUMAR S/O BHEEKAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12948/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41093] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12948/2025 Babi Kumar S/o Bheekam Singh, R/o Kharauli, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpura (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Prakash S/o Late Laxminarayan, R/o Chainpur, Police Station Mansalpur, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena Mr. Akash Sharma Mr. Rahul Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Ms. Pankaj Solanki Mr. Arvind Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/10/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.84/2025 registered at Police Station Mansalpur, District-Karauli for offences under Section 80(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though the allegation against the present petitioner is that the petitioner had demanded dowry but factually deceased committed [2025:RJ-JP:41093] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12948/2025] suicide due to medical reasons/depression. He also submits that a compromise has been reached between both parties, settling their disputes. In support of his version he has filed the compromise deed also. Petitioner is behind the bars since 15.09.2025. Charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has admitted the factum of compromise between both the parties and he has made no objection to grant the benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Babi Kumar S/o Bheekam Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/192