Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47247 (RAJ)

SMT. ANUPA DADHICH W/O SHRI RAM AMIT SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA

CRLW/1507/2021 · 2025-11-07

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44783] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1507/2021 Smt. Anupa Dadhich W/o Shri Ram Amit Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 48, Heera Nagar Suryans Apartment Flat No. G-4 Opposite Of Ganga Jamna Pertrol Pump Gopalpura Bye-pass Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Govt. Information And Broadcasting Department New Delhi 2. Indian Broad Casting Foundation, Through Its Secretary Having Its Office Located At B-304 3Rd Floor, Ansal Palza Khaligaon Marg New Delhi 3. The State Of Raj., Through The Chief Secretary To The Govt. Home Department Secretariat Jaipur 4. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter Lalkothi Jaipur 5. The Advertising Standards Council Of India, Through Its Secretary Having Its Office Located At 219 Bombay Market 78 Tardeo Road Mumbai-400034 6. Amitabh Bachchan Host K.B.C. Company Limited, Ganyaal Plaza Andheri (W) Mumbai Maharashtra-400058 (India) 7. Directors Arunesh Kumar And Rahul Verma, K.B.C. Company Limited Ganyaal Plaza Andheri (W) Mumbai Maharashtra-400058 (India) 8. Sony India Pvt. Ltd., Through Managing Director A-18 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate Mathura Road New Delhi -110044 India 9. Station House Officer, Police Station Shyam Nagar Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order [2025:RJ-JP:44783] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1507/2021] 07/11/2025 This petition was filed in the year 2021, however, despite no steps have been taken to cure the defect(s). No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Perused the file along with documents, petitioner has prayed for a direction to punish the respondents with penalty of Rs. One Crore, however, the petition is silent in respect of the fact as to whether any proceedings either initiated by the petitioner or otherwise are pending against the respondents. Thus, there is nothing in the petition to show that the criminal petition is maintainable for seeking the relief as prayed for in the petition. In view of above, this petition is without substance and merit, hence, the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/81