Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47246 (ALL)

SMT DEEPA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME U.P. AT LUCKNOW & ANOTHER

NA529/981/2025 · 2025-05-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73479 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 981 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt Deepa Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary Home U.P. At Lucknow & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Sadab Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide Case No. 1735 of 2021 under Section 125 CrPC, Police Station- Naubasta, District-Kanpur Nagar pending in the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.4, Kanpur Nagar within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant before this Court is the aggrieved wife in the proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. which is pending since 2021. It is further submitted that opposite party no.2/ husband is not cooperating with the Court and adopting delaying tactics in the matter the case is pending at the stage of evidence, as a result of which the applicant is in the condition of starvation for want of money. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. From perusal of the record it appears that the opposite party no.2/ husband although appeared before the Court but since he is not appearing in the Court regularly the matter is pending unnecessarily. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid application in accordance with law preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad