RAVI SHANKAR AGARWAL SON OF SHRI TEJRAM AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6488/2024 · 2025-10-29
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6488/2024 Ravi Shankar Agarwal Son Of Shri Tejram Agarwal, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of F-207, Prashant Vihar, Sector-14, Rohini, New Delhi. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/10/2025
1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.348/2022 registered with Police Station Ashok Nagar, Jaipur City (South).
2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 17.10.2022, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted.
[2025:RJ-JP:43456] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6488/2024]
4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of October, 2022, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.
5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/54