E. Ashok Reddy v. The Commissioner Endowments (AP)
WP/12920/2016 · 2025-09-25
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47243 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47243 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010394812016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12920/2016 Between:
1. E. ASHOK REDDY, S/O LATE GANGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC: WORKING AS SUPERINTENDENT AND MANAGER SRI RAMESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, GANGANAMMAPETA TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS AP, DHARMIKA BHAVAN, TILAK ROAD BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
2 MRK,J W.P.No.12920 of 2016
The Court made the following ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:
“….to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in taking up the proceedings under Section 133 of Endowments Act in spite of interim order dated 9-11-2015 passed in W.P.No. 32206/2015 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the orders dated 15-2-2016 passed in 0.A.No.6/2015 and certificate issued under Sec.133 (2)(b) of Endowments Act by the 2nd respondent....”
2. On 24.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 25.09.2025 under the caption „for dismissal‟. On 25.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption of dismissal. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioner. 4. Per contra, Ms. K.Ujwala Devi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, submits that presently the petitioner is promoted as Executive Officer Grade-I and he is posted as Executive Officer, Sri Rameswara Swamy Temple, Ganganampeta, Tenali, Guntur District. To substantiate the same, she also filed the proceedings in Rc.No.E2/5790/2016- 2, dated 15.02.2019. 3 MRK,J W.P.No.12920 of 2016
5. The same is placed on record. 6. In view of the fact that there is no representation for the petitioner coupled with the representation made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 26.09.2025 Ivd
4 MRK,J W.P.No.12920 of 2016
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.12920 of 2016
Date: 26.09.2025
Ivd