Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4724 (AP)

THUMMAPUDI RAJESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2073/2025 · 2025-02-05

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010037252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2073/2025 Between: Thummapudi Rajesh ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner to Police Station and bringing pressure on the petitioner to come to terms with the unofficial respondent in respect of financial 2 transactions between them as illegal arbitrary and violative of his fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the financial disputes in between petitioner and the unofficial respondent forthwith and pass such...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on written instructions would submit that basing on the report of respondent No.6, respondent No.5 registered F.I.R vide Crime No.19 of 2025 of Tadikonda Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 79, 351(2) BNS, 2023 and investigating into the case. 4. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be closed at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits by directing the respondent/Police to follow due procedure established under law, if they intend to call the petitioner to the Police Station, during investigation of the case. 3 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 05.02.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2073 of 2025 Date: 05.02.2025 PSA