Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47236 (BOM)

PRIYANKA PRAKASH RATHOD AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

WP/3065/2021 · 2025-06-18

Shri Nitin W Sambre, Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 541 wp 3065.21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3065/2021 (Ku. Priyanka Prakash Rathod & ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P.N. Shende, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.M. Kadukar, AGP for State. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ . DATED : 18/06/2025. Heard. 2. In spite of the objections being notified and sufficient chances being granted, the objections are not removed. 3. As such, by way of last chance, we grant time of three weeks to remove office objections. 4. Failure to remove office objections will entail the dismissal of the petition without further reference to the Court. ( SACHIN S. DESHMUKH , J.) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE , J.) Gohane