Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47233 (CHH)

SMT. PRATIMA TIRKEY v. DHEERAJ CHAURASIYA

MAC/1008/2025 · 2025-12-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60756 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Praveen Das, Advocate MAC No. 1008 of 2025 1. Smt. Pratima Tirkey W/o Late Chainus Tirkey Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Jajga Police Station And Tehsil Sitapur District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh (Claimants) 2. Kumari Romi Tirkey D/o Late Chainus Trikey Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Jajga Police Station And Tehsil Sitapur District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh 3. Rohit Trikey S/o Late Chainus Trikey Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Jajga Police Station And Tehsil Sitapur District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh 4. Kumari Rohita Tirkey D/o Late Chainus Tirkey Aged About 16 Years (Through Her Mother Smt. Pratima Tirkey R/o Village Jajga Police Station And Tehsil Sitapur District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh 5. Kumari Richa Tirkey D/o Late Chainus Tirkey Aged About 14 Years (Through He Mother Smt. Pratima Tirkey ) R/o Village Jajga Police Station And Tehsil Sitapur District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Dheeraj Chaurasiya S/o Jagdish Prashad Chaurasiya Aged About 40 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Chaurisaya In Annexuer P-1) R/o Ward No. 2 Near Vishwakarma Mandir Junnardev Police Station Junnardev Tehsil Chindwada District - Chindwada (M.P.)(Driver/ Owner ) 2. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Through Its Branch Manager Branch Office Second Floor Shivmohan Bhawan Vidhansabha Road Pandri District - Raipur (C.G.) (Insurance Company) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant (s) : Mr. Aditya Kumar Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Ashutosh Rathore, Advocate JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.12.16 12:42:31 +0530 2 AWARD (Passed on 13.12.2025) 1. The Parties have filed a docket/compromise petition stating therein that Respondent No. 2/ Insurance Company has agreed to pay additional amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. Two Lakhs only) within a period of 60 days from today. The docket is duly filled-in and signed by both the parties. 2. The compromise sought for by the parties is permitted and the matter in hand stands disposed of. 3. The docket be made part of this record. 4. A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award passed today, forthwith. Conditions imposed by the Claims Tribunal will remain intact. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Praveen Das) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Jyoti