APHC010519952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26808/2025 Between: 1. PAILA GANGA, W/O. PAILA GANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC:HOMEMAKER, R/O.CHINNABODDEPALLI VILLAGE, KOTAVUTLA MANDAL, ANKAPALLE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-531117. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANKAPALLE, ANKAPALLE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM NARSIPATNAM DIVISION, ANKAPALLE DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNABODDEPALLI VILLAGE, ANKAPALLE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. PYLA POLAYYA TATABAI, S/O LATE RAMAYYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/AT DR. NO. 1-48, K.O.MALLAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. REDDY RAMU, S/O.LATE SANYASI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, CULTIVATION. R/AT DR. NO. 4-28, PADABODDEPALLI VILLAGE, NARSIPATNAM MUNICIPALITY, ANAKAPAILLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. REDDY RAMALAKSHMI, W/O.RAMU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.DR.NO.4-28, PEDABODDEPALLI VILLAGE, NARSIPATNAM MUNICIPALITY ANAKAPAILLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, 2 one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring action of respondent authorities in trying to mutate the web land entries in respect of petitioner's land situated in Sy.No.95 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.55 cents situated in Chinaboddepalli Village, Kotavutla Mandal, Ankapalle District at the behest of the unofficial respondents without issuing any notice as mandated under Section 5(3) of the Andhra Pradesh (Rights in Lands and Pattadar Passbook) Act, 1972 despite the pendency of civil suit in O.S. No. 253 of 2025 on the file of Hon'ble Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Narsipatnam filed by the petitioner herein for permanent prohibitory injunction as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and amounts to infringement of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to mutate the web land entries in respect of petitioner's land situated in Sy.No.95 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.55 cents situated in Chinaboddepalli Village, Kotavutla Mandal, Ankapalle District without giving notice and following due process of law. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim direction duly directing the authorities not to mutate and create any third-party rights over the subject land Sy.No.95 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.55 cents situated in Chinaboddepalli Village, Kotavutla Mandal, Ankapalle District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P. NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 26808 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent authorities in trying to mutate the web land entries in respect of petitioner's land situated in Sy.No.95 admeasuring Ac.1.55 cents situated in Chinaboddepalli Village, Kotavutla Mandal, Ankapalle District at the behest of the unofficial respondents without issuing any notice as mandated under Section 5(3) of the Andhra Pradesh (Rights in Lands and Pattadar Passbook) Act, 1972 despite the pendency of civil suit in O.S. No. 253 of 2025 on the file of Hon'ble Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Narsipatnam filed by the petitioner herein for permanent prohibitory injunction as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and amounts to infringement of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to mutate the web land entries in respect of petitioner's land situated in Sy.No.95 admeasuring Ac.1.55 cents situated in Chinaboddepalli Village, Kotavutla Mandal, Ankapalle District without giving notice and following due process of law and pass such order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the official respondents at the behest of the unofficial respondents are trying to mutate the web land entries in respect of the petitioner’s subject land, without following the due process of law. 4 3. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities to follow the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and others reported in AIR 2008 AP 15, before effecting the mutation of the revenue records and web land entries in favour of the unofficial respondents. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 26.09.2025 SPP 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 26808 OF 2025 Date: 26.09.2025 SPP