[2025:RJ-JP:46638] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13789/2025 Nandlal @ Nanda S/o Harchand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kumawaton Ka New Village Police Station Kekdi City District Ajmer Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Niwai District Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 19/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.130/2025 registered at Police Station Newai, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record and the fact that the accused-petitioner is alleged to have committed theft of a [2025:RJ-JP:46638] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13789/2025] motorcycle and the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Nandlal @ Nanda S/o Harchand is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is directed that if he is found to be involved in offence of similar nature in future, then the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 1st & 15th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. 7. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its compliance. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /121