Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4723 (UTT)

ANAND MOHAN DIMRI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/482/2025 · 2025-05-15

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No.482 of 2025 Anand Mohan Dimri and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present: Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State/respondents. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral) By means of instant petition, the petitioners have sought the following reliefs:- “(i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to forthwith grant the Promotion Pay Scale (Grade Pay of Rs.5400/-) to the petitioners from due date, details whereof is given in Para 5 of the writ petition, along with arrears of the same. (ii) To issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iii) To award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 11.04.2017, passed in WPSS No. 602 of 2014, Deep Chandra Badhani and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and other connected matters. 2 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 11.04.2017, passed in WPSS No. 602 of 2014, Deep Chandra Badhani and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and other connected matters (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 15.05.2025 Jitendra