MADHAV KUMAR ALIAS MINTU ALIAS CHANDI S/O RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12795/2025 · 2025-10-16
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12795/2025 Madhav Kumar Alias Mintu Alias Chandi S/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sonava Ki Dungri, Police Station Arawali Vi- har, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, Addl.GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 16/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”) has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.600/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar, District Alwar, wherein he is charged for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) & 352 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNS”) and subsequently, he has been charged for the offences punishable under Section 118(2) of BNS in addition to the offences mentioned in the FIR.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations of causing grievous injury by chewing the fingers of the injured have been levelled against the co-accused Harsh Shreevastav and there is no allegation of causing grievous injury against the petitioner. Counsel submits that the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and the petitioner is presently in custody and
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-12795/2025] since trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and there is no allegation of causing grievous injury against the petitioner and considering that trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS.
6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Madhav Kumar @ Mintu @ Chandi S/o Rajesh Kumar arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /228