APHC010707292017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28878/2017 Between: 1. P. SRILAKSHMI , KRISHNA DIST & ANR, D/O. PINNAMANENI PARANDHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, OCC : HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PLOT NO. 119, 3RD LANE, RTC COLONY, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA, A.P. 2. BABY NIDHANA,, D/O. VUJJWAL NAGENDRA KUMAR, REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SRILAKSHMI PINNAMENENI, R/O. PLOT NO. 119, 3RD LANE, RTC COLONY, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, VIJAWADA, KRISHNA A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA 2 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI- 695 001., 2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD. 3. THE BUREAU OF COUNCILLOR AFFAIRS, REP. BY ITS CONSULATE GENERAL, USA CONSULATE, REGIONAL OFFICE AT CHIRAN FORT LANE, BEGUMPET, SECUNDERABAD, 500003 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or orders or direction or directions or a writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to renew/issue Passport of the 2nd Petitioner on the ground of non submission of 2 consent letter of the father of the 2nd petitioner is illegal, arbitrary violative of principles of natural Justice and consequentially permit petitioners to apply for renewal /issuing of the Passport of the 2nd Petitioner 'without the consent of the father of the 2nd Petitioner' i.e. Mr. Ujjwal Nagendra Kumar Velagapudi and b) permit petitioners to travel with the 2nd Petitioner herein i.e. Baby Nidhana to U.S.A. in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 35923 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Court may permit the Petitioner to travel with the second Petitioner i.e. Baby Nidhana Veiagapudi to USA pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP 170030 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Mr.Velagapudi Vujwal Nagendra Kumar as party/respondent No.4 in the writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RUKMINI (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn 4 77 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.28878 of 2017 17th September, 2025 cbn